I’m sort of dying to know what the third party in that affair — Hillary Clinton — is thinking.
Here we go again with yet another “national conversation” about guns that is neither a conversation nor national. And not productive.
At least one school district warned that kids participating in any kind of demonstration during class hours would face suspension.
Our on-screen heroes always had more subdued, less fantastic obligations: They had to survive Act 1, Scene 1.
What is exploitative are political actors who will use this shooting to actually raise money.
There’s no need for Uncle Sam to play venture capitalist.
Mueller’s team is not leaking information, and is proceeding with extreme care and due diligence.
Trade partnerships supported by NAFTA provide for a stable source of energy to supplement our own strong production.
Like most recent trade deals, NAFTA was negotiated quite explicitly to help businesses improve their profitability.
They’re fighting back with a weapon more powerful than guns: their voices.
How interesting that Wednesday’s events have apparently nothing to do with the killer having a gun.
The use of the Second Amendment to block consideration of sensible gun control measures is a national disgrace.
It’s not strictly correct to argue, as many legal professionals do, that judges should be removed only for personal misconduct.
