Officers involved in fatal shooting sue city councilmember over her comments

The suit, filed last week in King County Superior Court, was brought against her as an individual.

SEATTLE — The two Seattle police officers who fatally shot Che Taylor last year have filed a defamation lawsuit against City Councilwoman Kshama Saw­ant, alleging she falsely declared they had committed a “brutal murder” before they were cleared of wrongdoing by an inquest jury.

The suit, filed last week in King County Superior Court, was brought against Sawant as an individual.

Efforts to reach Sawant for comment Tuesday were not immediately successful.

The highly unusual suit does not name the city of Seattle or the City Council as defendants, pointedly stating that Officers Scott Miller and Michael Spaulding “do not want one red cent of public money.”

“This is a complaint seeking damages against one individual who, acting in her own capacity and only on her own behalf, defamed two good men,” the suit says.

Miller and Spaulding “do a hard job for modest pay and little thanks — realities they accept,” the suit adds. “But what they do not accept, and what the law does not permit, is having their reputations ruined by an ambitious politician, doing so for personal gain.”

Earlier this year, a King County inquest jury found that Taylor, 46, posed a threat of death or serious injury when Miller and Spaulding shot him on Feb. 21, 2016, while trying to arrest him as a felon in unlawful possession of a firearm.

The two officers, who are white, were conducting an undercover operation in search of another man wanted on a drug warrant when Taylor, an African-American, arrived in a car, jurors were told during the fact-finding proceeding.

The officers testified that they recognized Taylor and knew he had a criminal history. Taylor had served a lengthy prison sentence, with convictions for rape and robbery.

Miller testified he saw a handgun in a holster on Taylor’s right hip as Taylor left the car. Miller said he then informed Spaulding.

When they confronted Taylor, the officers testified, Taylor crouched and reached to his right hip, with his elbow bent in a motion consistent with drawing a gun.

Both officers said Taylor’s body blocked their view of his hip, but they were convinced he was reaching for a gun.

Jurors agreed unanimously that Taylor showed his hands and moved downward after the officers gave him commands.

They also found Spaulding had reason to believe Taylor was drawing a gun, and six jurors concluded Miller thought Taylor was drawing a gun, while two answered “unknown.”

Taylor, who was standing next to another car, had ignored commands to get on the ground, the officers said.

A Seattle police review board found last year the shooting fell within department policy and, after the inquest, King County Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg declined to bring criminal charges against Spaulding and Miller.

The lawsuit against Sawant says that about five days after the shooting, she appeared before a crowd and news media in front of the Police Department.

While her appearance was not official city business or a legislative function, Sawant “implied awareness of inside factual information,” the suit alleges.

“With gravitas established, she went on to pronounce Che Taylor’s death a ‘brutal murder’ and product of ‘racial profiling,’” the suit says.

Her statements weren’t qualified as opinion and she did not acknowledge the ongoing investigation, according to the suit.

“She, instead, tried and convicted the officers herself in the court of public opinion,” the suit alleges.

Despite the inquest ruling, Sawant continues to refer to the shooting as a “murder” and publicly asserts the officers avoided “accountability,” the suit says.

Sawant has not responded to the officers’ request to retract her statements, the suit says.

Seattle Times news researcher Miyoko Wolf contributed to this story.