U.S. Department of Education officials are holding three days of virtual public hearings starting Monday, June 21, that will focus on potential changes to Trump-era guidelines critics believe have made it more difficult to repay student loans.
The revisions include strengthening protections for borrowers harmed by misleading practices by their college. The department last week announced the approval of 18,000 borrower defense claims for former students of ITT Technical Institute, which exaggerated its job-placement numbers among other things. These borrowers will receive 100% loan discharges, resulting in approximately $500 million in relief.
The department’s new secretary, Miguel Cardona, said in a statement announcing the hearings that he wants to take “a fresh look at a range of regulations to make sure they are not creating unnecessary barriers, but instead can ensure that institutions and programs serve our students well.”
Federal data show that less than 6% of applicants for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program were eligible for the program, which forgives loans for borrowers working for the government or a nonprofit who have made 10 years worth of loan payments.
More attention has been paid to student loan debt in recent years as the combined total held by the federal government has reached $1.6 trillion, which is more than the nation’s total auto loan debt. There’s been pressure on President Joe Biden to cancel up to $50,000 per borrower. Biden has proposed canceling $10,000. Federal officials at the start of the coronavirus pandemic paused required payments and lowered interest rates to 0%. The pause is scheduled to end Sept. 30.
Much of the ire of borrowers and student loan reform advocates is focused on for-profit and online colleges. The loan default rate at those schools is often greater than 10%, much higher than public and private colleges and universities.
The schools typically recruit military veterans and working adults pursuing degrees to advance their careers. For-profit colleges were the only sector of higher education that saw enrollment increases on the undergraduate and graduate level last fall, 3% and 9% respectively, National Student Clearinghouse statistics show.
Many for-profit schools have been under scrutiny in recent years for deceptive marketing practices, trouble students have had transferring credits and getting jobs after graduation. A few, such as Argosy University, which had an Atlanta-area campus, have shut down, giving little notice to students.
Mykol Sutton attended the University of Phoenix in the mid-1990s and had to leave three courses short of a degree after exhausting the eligibility for undergraduate student loans. Sutton returned in 2013 and was told credits in core classes such as economics expired because the curriculum had changed, which would require Sutton to start from scratch.
“I would never recommend a for-profit school to anyone,” Sutton, who has about $120,000 in debt, said via email. “This was a life-long costly mistake.”
Federal education officials have what experts say is a large agenda of items they hope to address through the rulemaking hearings. Some are focused on for-profit schools.
One potential change is reviving guidelines crafted by the Obama administration that were aimed at for-profit colleges by limiting federal aid to schools that inadequately prepared students to find jobs. The Trump administration overhauled the “gainful employment” guidelines, saying in part it was too broad.
Trump’s education secretary, Betsy DeVos, argued the Obama administration rules often overreached in protections for students. She argued most borrowers got some educational value from for-profit colleges and merited partial, not full, relief from their federal loans. DeVos bashed the idea of complete debt cancellation and free tuition as “government gift giving.”
The Biden administration, in general, has a different approach.
Whitney Barkley-Denney, senior policy counsel for the Center for Responsible Lending, a nonprofit with offices in Washington, D.C., North Carolina and California, believes these hearings could be the start of major changes that could help borrowers.
“This feels like a course correction in hopefully getting to revisit some of the most damaging policies of the Trump administration’s Department of Education,” Barkley-Denney said.
Barkley-Denney is also curious to see what happens concerning enrollment contract clauses — primarily at for-profit colleges — that mandate arbitration in disputes between a school and borrowers instead of allowing students to pursue resolutions through lawsuits. The Obama administration effectively banned those contracts, but the Trump administration reversed those changes.
To register to watch or speak at the hearings, go to https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2021/index.html.